Research & Methods
Psychometric Transparency
We believe a personality platform should publish its scoring formulas, acknowledge its limitations, and refuse to present uncalibrated pilot tests as finished clinical science.
Measurement Engine
Scoring Methodology
How raw responses are transformed into 0–100 scale scores, why scale scores differ from percentiles, and how the continuous Type Lens operates.
Read methodology →Questionnaire BankItem Development
The 60-item development bank, 36-item Quick Map subset, reverse keying rules, and selective shared-item architecture.
Read item development →Empirical RoadmapValidation Program
Future empirical validation milestones: test-retest reliability, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and representative norm sets.
Read validation roadmap →Changelog & AuditVersion History
Immutable audit log of assessment items, scoring model algorithms, report narrative rules, and norm identifiers. Old results never silently mutate.
View version history →Scientific Boundaries & Disclaimers
Scale Score vs Percentile:Scores on this website are linear transformations (0 to 100) of your keyed responses. They do not claim to compare you against a general population percentile until calibrated norm sets exist.
Independent Assessment:This site administers an independent four-preference model and a Big Five model. It does not administer the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI®) and is not affiliated with The Myers-Briggs Company or 16Personalities.